Birmingham Tax Hike Angers Residents Paying More for Less Service

Birmingham faces 7.5% council tax rise amid budget cuts. Residents express anger over declining services and increased costs.

Birmingham Tax Hike Angers Residents Paying More for Less Service
Birmingham Tax Hike Angers Residents Paying More for Less Service

Birmingham residents now see the budget’s impact. The council faces a financial crisis, implementing cuts and raising council tax. This affects every part of city life, and readers feel angry about paying more.

The city wanted to raise council tax by 9.99%, but the government said no. They revealed a £148.4 million cuts package.

Council taxes will increase by 7.5%. They will sell council properties and land, aiming for £1 billion in asset sales this year.

Savings were identified last year, including £149 million in cuts, and hundreds of job losses occurred then. The council faces increased service demands, with Adult and Children’s Social Care needs rising. Temporary housing demand also adds pressure, and broader economic issues exist too.

One person thinks councilors should get small raises, matching pensioners’ increases. They also want the Perry Barr project finished, providing housing for people in need.

Another person believes councilors should take pay cuts, blaming them for the financial mess. They ask why services for children and disabled people should suffer.

Someone asks about unpaid council tax, thinking honest people pay the most while others avoid paying or become “exempt.”

Another person asks about airport shares, suggesting selling £300 million in shares to avoid burdening residents with higher taxes.

One person complains about rising costs, noting that water, gas, and food cost more. They want to know when prices will stop rising.

Someone else says they pay more and get less.

Another person asks what the higher taxes fund, noting that roads are bad and crime is high. They mentioned bin men going on strike and questions what citizens actually pay for, believing it isn’t for expected services.

One person finds the cuts confusing, thinking job losses seem inevitable; for example, biweekly bin collections save £4.5m. Fewer collections mean fewer needed workers, a situation that likely exists across the council.

One person thinks residents won’t accept the tax increase and opposes cuts to essential services. Residents have paid for past mistakes before.

Image Credits and Reference: https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/news-opinion/paying-more-getting-less-anger-30948764
Disclaimer: Images on this site are shared to inform users under fair use guidelines. They come from public sources, and we try to use official ones. For any issues, get in touch.
Fact-Checking Policy: We collect facts from reliable sources and double-check them before publishing. If you notice a mistake, let us know, and we’ll correct it fast.

Education journalist covering primary school developments, community stories, and child-centric policies.